Effect of polymers on soil moisture content and some growth characteristics of corn plant under drought stress

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman,Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background and objectives: Increase of water holding capacity induced by polymers has been developed in arid and semi-arid regions. The effect of polymers on increasing water holding capacity and the effect of selected polymers on some growth characteristics of corn plant under drought stress was carried out in both experimental and greenhouse condition, respectively.
Materials and methods: The present research included two complementary parts performed in laboratory and greenhouse. First, the effect of 11 polymer treatments (polymer type and concentration) including Karacoat 1and 3 %, Acrylic 1 and 3 %, Polyvinyl acetate 1 and 3 %, Superab 0.5 and 1 %, Stockosorb 0.5 and 1 % and control without polymer on moisture changes of two soils (loamy sand and sand) during 11 times (0, 12 h, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 day) were studied in laboratory and 4 best polymer treatments were selected for greenhouse cultivation. In greenhouse, the effect of polymer treatments (Karacoat 1and 3 %, Stockosorb 0.5 and 1 % and control without polymer) under drought stress (30, 50 and 80 % field capacity) on some growth characteristics of corn plant (leaf number, height, wet and dry weight of stem and wet and dry weight of root) were studied separately in loamy sand and sandy soils.
Results: Results showed that increase of moisture in both treated soils was higher than control and from this point of view, water soluble polymer-Karacoat 3 % (18.5 % compared to loamy sand control and 35.9 % compared to sandy control) and Stockosorb 1 % hydrogel (95.8 % compared to loamy sand control and 3.4 times compared to sandy control) were more powerful. Mean moisture after 20 days for water soluble polymers and Superab hydrogel was higher in loamy sand than sandy soil. But, Stockosorb 1 % hydrogel was more effective in sandy soil (16.1 % increase compared to loamy sand soil). With increasing polymer concentration, the moisture content of polymer treated soil samples increased. To increasing water holding capacity Stockosorb 1% hydrogel in loamy sand (0-12 day) and sandy (0-16 day) soils was more successful than other polymer treatments. Both water holding capacity during the time and final moisture content in sandy soil treated with polymers were more than loamy sand soil. Leaf number, stem height, wet and dry weight of stem and dry weight of root in corn plant were reduced under drought stress. In contrast, height, wet and dry weight of corn stem were better in stockosorb hydrogel 1 % treatment. Wet weight of corn stem in loamy sand soil under drought stress was significantly affected (P < 0.01) by stockosorb hydrogel. Stockosorb 1% hydrogel increased wet weight of stem 59.29, 82.41 percent and 3.82 time in low, medium and severe stress compared to control, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the results karacoat 3 % and stockosorb 1 % are recommended for increasing moisture and water holding capacity of coarse texture soils. Moreover, polymer materials with properties such as useful longevity, high efficiency at low concentrations, and local application in the root zone of trees could provide ideal condition for plant which growth in soils with low water holding capacity. In addition, they are ideal for drought condition that is common in arid and semi-arid regions where rain is low and evaporation is high.

Keywords


1.Al-Harbi, A.R., Al-Omran, A.M., Shalaby, A.A., and Choudhary, M.L. 1999. Efficiency of a hydrophilic polymer declines with time in green house experiments. American Society for Horticultural Science. 34: 2. 223-224.
2.Al-Khanbashi, A., and Abdalla, S.W. 2006. Evaluation of three waterborne polymers as stabilizers for sandy soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 24:6.1603-1625.
3.Allah Dadi, A., Moazen Ghamsari, B., Akbari, G.H., and Zohoorian Mehr, M. 2005. Investigation of the effect of different amount of water super absorbent polymer 200-A and irrigation levels on growth and yield of forage corn. In: Proceedings of 3rd specific symposium on application of super absorbent polymer hydro gels in agriculture, Petrochemistry and Polymer Research Center Iran.(In Persian)
4.Al-Omran, A.M., Mustafa, M.A., and Shalaby, A.A. 1987. Intermittent evaporation from soil columns as affected by a gel-forming conditioner. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 51: 6. 1593-1599.
5.Banedjschafie, S., Rahbar, E., and Khaksarian, F. 2006. Effect of a super absorbent polymers on moisture characteristics of sandy soils. J. Range. Des. Res. 13: 2. 139-144. (In Persian)
6.Bhat, N.R., Suleiman, M.K., Al-Menaie, H., Al-Ali, E.H., Al-Mulla, L., Christopher, A., Lekha, V.S., Ali, S.I., and George, P. 2009. Polyacrylamide polymer and salinity effects on water requirement of conocarpus lancifolius and selected properties of sandy loam soil. Europ. J. Sci. Res. 25: 4. 549-558.
7.Dashtbozorg, A., Sayyad, G., Kazeminezhad, I., and Mesgarbashi, M. 2013. The effects of different sizes of particles of a superabsorbent polymer on water holding capacity of two different soil textures. J. Agric. Engin. 36: 1. 65-75. (In Persian)
8.Fry, J.D., and Butler, J.D. 1989.Water management during tall fescue establishment. American Society for Horticultural Science. 24: 1. 79-81.
9.Gee, G.W., and Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis. P 383-409, In: A. Klute, (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
10.Geesing, D., and Schmidhalter, U.2004. Influence of sodium polyacrylate on the water-holding capacity of three different soils and effects on growth of wheat. Soil Use and Management.20: 2. 207-209.
11.Gholami, M., Sajedi, N., and Gomarian, M. 2012. Effects of super absorbent polymer, zinc and selenium application on yield and yield components of durum wheat. New Finding in Agriculture.7: 1. 69-80. (In Persian)
12.Jafarzadeh, S., Eghbal, M.K., and Jalalian, A. 2005. Biological and mechanical stabilization of sand dunes using super-absorbent polymers and clay mulch in Ardestan area (Isfahan). P 1-4, In: Proceedings of international conference on human impacts on soil quality attributes, Isfahan, Iran.
13.Jhurry, P. 1997. Agricultural Polymers. Food and Agricultural Research Council Reduit, Mauritius, Pp: 109-113.
14.Khadem, S.A., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., and Rousta, M.J. 2011. The effect of drought stress and different rates of animal manure with super absorbent polymer on grain yield and yield components of Corn (Zea mays L.).J. Field Crop Sci. 42: 1. 115-123.(In Persian)
15.Klute, A., and Dirksen, C. 1986.Sieve analysis (mechanical method).P 722-724, In: A. Klute (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
16.Liu, J., Shi, B., Lu, Y., Jiang, H.,Huang, H., Wang, G., and Kamai, T. 2012. Effectiveness of a new organic polymer sand-fixing agent on sand fixation. Environmental Earth Sciences. 65: 3. 589-595.
17.Lu, J., Wu, L., Letey, J., and Farmer, W.J. 2002. Picloram and napropamide sorption as affected by polymer addition and salt concentration. J. Environ. Qual. 31: 4. 1234-1239.
18.Mortezavi, S.M., Tavakoli, A., Mohammadi, M.H., and Afsahi, K. 2013. Effect of superabsorbent on physiological traits and yield of wheat Azar2 cultivar under dry farming condition. Agron. J. (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi). 106: 118-125. (In Persian)
19.Movahedan, M., Abbasi, N., and Keramati, M. 2011. Experimental investigation of polyvinyl acetate polymer application for wind erosion control of soils. J. Water Soil.25: 3. 606-616. (In Persian)
20.Naderi, F., and Vasheghani, F.B. 2006. Increasing soil water holding capacity by hydrophilic polymers. J. Soil Water Sci. 20: 1. 64-72. (In Persian)
21.Neyshabouri, M.R., and Reyhanitabar, A. 2011. Interpreting Soil Test Results (what do all the numbers mean?). Tabriz University Press. First Edition. 216p. (Translated in Persian)
22.Roustaie, K., Movahhedi Dehnavi, M., Khadem, S.A., and Owliaie, H.R. 2012. Effect of different super absorbent polymer and animal manure ratios on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of soybean under drought stress. J. Crop Improv. 14: 1. 33-42.(In Persian)
23.Salajegheh Tezerji, F., Mohammadi, H., and Sarcheshmehpour, M. 2014. Effect of water stress on root rot disease of pistachio seedlings caused by Fusarium solani. J. Plant Pathol. 50: 3. 131-133. (In Persian)
24.Sarmast, M., Farpoor, M.H. and Sarcheshmehpour, M. 2014. Saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil penetration resistance affected by some water soluble polymers. J. Water Soil Cons. 21: 1. 235-251. (In Persian)
25.Seyed Dorraji, S., Golchin, A., and Ahmadi, S.H. 2010. The effects of different levels of a superabsorbent polymer and soil salinity on water holding capacity with three textures of sandy, loamy and clay. J. Water Soil. 24: 2. 306-316. (In Persian)   
26.Shahbazi, A., Sarmadian, F., Refahi, H., and Gorji, M. 2005. Effect of polyacrylamide (PAM) on runoff and erosion of saline-sodic soils. J. Agric. Sci. 36: 5. 1103-1112. (In Persian)
27.Yu, J., Lei, T., Shainberg, I., Mamedov, A.I., and Levy, G.J. 2003. Infiltration and erosion in soils treated with dry PAM and gypsum. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 67: 2. 630-636.
28.Zeineldin, F.I., and Aldakheel, Y.Y. 2006. Hydrogel polymer effects on available water capacity and percolation of sandy soils at Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia. In: 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
29.Zlatković, S., and Rašković, L. 1998. The effect of the polyacrylamide, polyvinylalcohol and carboxymethyl cellulose on the aggregation of the soil and on the growth of the plants. Working and Living Environmental Protection. 1: 3. 17-23.