Separation Effective Soil Properties on Moisture Characteristic Curve Using Decision tree

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 shahrekord university

2 Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan

3 Shahrood university

4 soil science department, shahrekord university

Abstract

Background and objectives: Soft computational techniques have been widely used in scientific research and engineering in recent decades. Since the measurement of hydraulic properties by direct laboratory methods is hard, time consuming and expensive, Thus, there is need to use alternative methods based on conveniently available soil properties to estimate it with less effort, time and cost. One of the new methods for estimating soil hydraulic properties, such as soil moisture characteristic curve, is non-parametric methods. This study was performed to determine the efficiency of the decision tree method in
separation of effective properties in estimating soil moisture characteristic curve parameters.
Materials and methods: To perform this study, number of 72 points were selected in the village of Marghmalek and Sharekord city. Samples were collected from depth of 0-20 cm and then were transferred to the laboratory for required measurements. Some properties such as pH, EC, saturated moisture, calcium carbonate, organic matter, clay and sand, bulk density, mean weight diameter of dry aggregate, mean weight diameter of wet aggregate, geometric mean and standard deviation of particle diameter were measured in the laboratory. Also, the moisture characteristic curves were determined at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, 1000, 1500 kPa suctions and were fitted to the van Genuchten model. The input variables were introduced into the MATLAB software in two scenarios (first scenario: pH, EC, %clay and sand, organic matter, calcium carbonate, mean weight diameter of wet and dry aggregate, bulk density, saturated moisture and the second scenario: pH, EC, geometric mean and standard deviation of particle diameter, organic matter, calcium carbonate, mean weight diameter of wet and dry aggregate, bulk density, saturated moisture) and modeled by decision tree and error estimators of cross validation and resub stitution. Evaluation statistics of each model including R2, RMSE and %RMSE were calculated.
Results: The results obtained from decision tree modeling showed that the most important factors affecting moisture content in PWP suction, were saturated moisture and clay. The PWP target variable has the highest correlation in the first scenario (0.88) and in the second scenario )0.91( and the least error rate among the other variables, and after that, FC has the highest correlation (0.86) in the second scenario. Target variables n had the highest error rate and α the lowest correlation in both scenarios. Generally, the second scenario performed better than the first scenario by replacing the geometric mean and standard deviation of particle diameter with the percentage of clay and sand. The sensitivity analysis showed that PWP was the most sensitive among the input parameters to pH, BD, calcium carbonate and organic matter and FC was the most sensitive to geometric standard deviation of particle and MWDwet.
Conclusion: In general, modeling has been successful in both scenarios. But by substituting geometric mean and standard deviation of particle diameter instead of clay and sand percentage, a better performance was obtained in estimating moisture characteristic curve variables in the second scenario.

Keywords

References

1.Abbasi, Y.B., Ghanbarian-Alavijeh, A.M., Liaghat, A.M., and Shorafa. 2011. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve of saline and saline-alkali soils of Iran. Soil Science Society of China. 21: 2. 230-237.
2.Amir-Abedi, H., Asghari, Sh.A., Mesri-Gandshamin, T., and Keivanbehjo, F. 2013. Estimating of field capacity, permanent wilting and available water content in Ardabil plain soils using regression and artificial neural network models. Urmia Applied Soil Research.1: 1. 60-72. (In Persian)
3.Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal.
54: 464-465.
4.Farzadmehr, M., Chahmani, M., and Khayaki Siouki, A.S. 2018. Comparing decision tree and instance-based learning models to estimate soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research.
25: 5. 167-184. (In Persian)
5.Haghverdi, A., Ghahraman, B., Khoshnood Yazdi, A.A., and Arabi, Z. 2010. Estimating of water content in FC and PWP in north and north east of Iran's soil samples using k-nearest neighbor and artificial neural networks. Journal of Water and Soil, 24: 4. 804-814.(In Persian)
6.Hengle, T., and Husnjak, S. 2006. Evaluation adequacy and usability of soil maps in Croatia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70: 920-929.
7.Hutson, J.L., and Cass, A. 1987. A retentivity function for use in soil-water simulation models. Journal of Soil Science. 38: 105-113.
8.Kemper, W.D., and RoseNau, R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. P 425-442. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. american society of agronomy, Madison. ‏
9.Khashei Siuki, A., Jalali Moakhar, V.R., Noferesti, A.M., and Ramazani, Y. 2015. Comparing nonparametric k-nearest neighbor technique with ANN model for predicting soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. Journal of Soil Management in Sustainable Production. 5: 3. 81-95.(In Persian)
10.Klute, A., and Dirksen, C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. P 687-734. In: A. Klute (ed.). Method of soil analysis, Part1: Agronomy Soil Science Society of America Madison.WI.
11.Matsuyama, T. 1987. Knowledge- Based Aerial Image Understanding system and Expert System for Image Processing. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 25: 305-316.
12.Meshkani, A.S., and Nazemi, A.S. 2009. Introduction to Data Mining. Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad. 456p.
(In Persian)
13.Minasny, B. 2007. Prediction soil properties. Journal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan. 7: 54-67.
14.Moncada, M.P., Gabriels, D., and Cornelis, W.M. 2014. Data-driven analysis of soil quality indicators using limited data. Geoderma. 235: 271-278.
15.Motaghian, H.R., and Mohamadi, J. 2010. Comparison of some physical indicators of soil quality in different land uses in Marghmalak basin, Shahrekord (Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province). Journal of water and soil (Agricultural Sciences and Industries). 25: 1. 115-124. (In Persian)
16.Nemes, A., Rawls, W.J., and Pachepsky, Y.A. 2006. Use of the nonparametric nearest neighbor approach to estimate soil hydraulic properties. Journal of Soil Science Society of America. 70: 2. 327-336.
17.Openshaw, S., and Openshaw, C. 1997. Artificial Intelligence in Geography. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. 348p.
18.Page, M.C., Sparks, D.L., Noll, M.R., and Hendricks, G.J. 1987. Kinetics and mechanisms of potassium release from sandy Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain soils. Journal of Soil Science Society of America. 51: 1460-1465.
19.Ramezani, M., Ganbarian, B., Liaghat, AM., and Salehi Khoshkroudi, Sh. 2011. Developing pedotransfer functions for saline and saline- alkali soils. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management.1: 1. 99-110. (In Persian)
20.Shahrabi, C. 2011. Data Mining 2. First edition, Amir Kabir University Industrial Jihad Press, Tehran. 300p.
21.Shirani, H., and Rafienejad, N. 2012. Estimating of some missing soil properties with regression pedotransfer functions and neural network in the Kerman. Journal of Soil Research. 25. 4: 349-359. (In Persian)
22.Shirani, H. 2017. Artificial neural networks with an application in agricultural and natural resource sciences. Rafsanjan Univ. Press. 320p. (In Persian)
23.Walkley, A., and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Journal of Soil Science. 37: 29-38.
24.Zhou, J., and Yu, J.L. 2005. Influences affecting the soil-water characteristic curve. Journal of Zhejiang University Science. 6: 797-804.
Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production
Volume 10, Issue 3
December 2021
Pages 115-134

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics