Effect of straw checkerboard barriers method on physicochemical properties of soil and dust reduction in lands exposed to wind erosion of “Margh” meadow of Shahrekord

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Dept. of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture. Shahrekord University

2 Assistant Prof., Faculty of Natural Resource and Earth Science, Shahrekord University

3 Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Shahrekord University

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Wind erosion is a serious problem in arid and semi-arid area. In order to control wind erosion , some technical measures should be focused on the soil surface. Straw checkerboard barrier method as a cheap, effective and easy technology plays an important role in trapping dust and reducing wind erosion. Therefore, the objective of this research was to study the effect of straw checkerboard barriers method on physicochemical properties of soil and probable reduction of dust in lands exposed to wind erosion of Shahrekord meadow.
Materials and Methods: Straw checkerboard barriers were arranged in 1 m × 1 m checkerboard pattern in January, 2018 in a part of the “Margh” meadow of Shahrekord, the capital of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Rice straw materials were buried in the soil to a depth of 15 cm horizontally and protruded 20 cm above the soil surface. The study was carried out on a 20 × 25 m land area. The same area was also dedicated for control as bare ground. In order to determine the role of this technique on the wind erosion and its control, vertical sediment traps with a circular cross section of PVC pipe (PVC), 5 sediment traps were randomly installed in the bare ground, 5 in the first area of the checkered barrier, 5 in the middle and 5 at the end of the barrier in the direction of the prevailing wind. Sampling began in late July and was performed every 30 days in five stages. The height of the trap was divided into four parts: 0-12, 12-24, 36-24 and 48-36 cm and the amounts of sediments collected in the installed traps were compared with each other. Wind speed and direction were also measured in the mentioned months and the wind rose was drawn subsequently. Data were analyzed in RCBD design with 5 replications. Sediment trap position was considered as the first factor in three levels and trap height class were considered as the second factor. Also, during two consecutive years after the establishment of straw checkerboard barriers, soil properties including aggregate stability, percentage of clay, silt and sand, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus were measured.
Results: Results showed that checkerboards reduced the amounts of sediments significantly. This trend was observed in the five sampling month especially for the traps at the end of the barriers. The wind speed in the collision of barriers decreased significantly with lower amounts of energy, resulted to lowest amount of sediment at the end of barriers. Amount of sediments in the first, middle and end area of the checkerboard barriers in July, August, September and October decreased with the height of the trap drawer. But in November the sediments increased till height of 24 cm that may be due to higher rates of winds and particle movements. The highest mean weight diameter of aggregates was observed in border of barriers which may be associated with significant increase in organic carbon in the borders. Organic carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus contents were affected by straw checkerboard barriers and increased in the borders. Fine particles of soil included silt and clay were increased inside the squares accounts for unloading of particles and or deposition of them from the air.
Conclusion: The establishment of straw checkerboard barriers reduced the amount of wind sediments significantly compared to the bare ground. On the other hand, effective particle stabilization and dust deposition increased in checkerboards. Also checkerboard improved the physicochemical properties and increase some nutrients might promising for better microclimate for plant establishment and growth, leading to biodiversity and sustainability return.

Keywords

References

1.Berg, W.A., Bradford, J.A., and Sims, P.L. 1997. Long-term soil nitrogen and vegetation change on sandhill rangeland. Journal of Range Management. 50: 482-486.
2.Bo, T.L., Ma, P., and Zheng, X.J. 2015. Numerical study on the effect of semi-buried straw checkerboard sand barriers belt on the wind speed. Aeolian Research. 16: 101-107.
3.Bo, T.L., and Zheng, X.J. 2013. Numerical simulation of the evolution and propagation of aeolian dune
fields toward a desert–oasis zone. Geomorphology. 180: 24-32.
4.Bouyoucos, G.J. 1951. A recalibration of hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soil. American Society of Agronomy. 43: 434-438.
5.Bremner, J.M., and Mulvaney, C.S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. P 595-624. In: A.L.Page (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy. Madison, WI.
6.Bruno, L., Fransos, D., and Giudice, A.L. 2018. Solid barriers for windblown sand mitigation: Aerodynamic behavior and conceptual design guidelines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 173: 79-90.
7.Chen, X., and Zhou, J. 2013. Volume-based soil particle fractal relation with soil erodibility in a small watershed of purple soil. Environmental Earth Sciences. 70: 1735-1746.
8.Chun Lai, Z.H., Na, Z.H., and JiaQiong, Z.H. 2014. Sand flux and wind profiles in the saltation layer above a rounded
dune top. Science China: Earth Sciences. 57: 523-533.
9.D’Odorico, P., Bhattachan, A., Davis, K.F., Ravi, S., and Runyan, C.W. 2013. Global desertification: drivers and feedbacks. Advances in Water Resource. 51: 326-344.
10.Dai, Y., Dong, Z., Li, H., He, Y., Li,J., and Guo, J. 2019. Effects of checkerboard barriers on the distribution of aeolian sandy soil particles and soil organic carbon. Geomorphology. 338: 79-87.
11.Dai, Y.J., Guo, J.Y., Dong, Z., Li, J.R., and Li, H.L. 2017. Spatial distribution of soil particles and heavy metals
under different psammophilic shrubs in the Ulan Buh desert. Environmental Science. 38: 4809-4818.
12.Dong, Z.B., Fryrear, D.W., and Gao, S.Y. 2000. Modeling the roughness effect of blown-sand controlling standing vegetation in wind tunnel. Journal of Desert Research. 20: 260-263.
13.Edwards, C.A. 2004. Earthworm Ecology. 3rd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 441p.
14.Gao, Y., Qiu, G.Y., Ding, G.D., Hideyuki, Sh., Yi, Y., Chunyuan, H., Yan-ping, L., Kazuo, T., Yi, W., and Ji, W. 2004. Effect of Salix psammophila checkerboard on reducing wind and stabilizing sand. Journal of Desert Research. 24: 365-370.
15.Huang, N., Xia, X., and Tong, D. 2013. Numerical simulation of wind sand movement in straw checkerboard barriers. The European Physical Journal E. 36: 99-110.
16.Kang, S., Ghosh, S., and Xing, B. 2006. Adsorption and stabilization of organic carbon by mineral surfaces in soils. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry.25: 263-264.
17.Kaskaoutis, D.G., Rashki, A., Houssos, E.E., Bartzokas, A., Francois, P., Legrand, M., and Middleton, N.J. 1986. Dust storms in the Middle East. Journal of Arid Environment. 10: 83-96.
18.Kenneth, P., and Haim, T. 2009. Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes. Springer. 458p.
19.Li, Sh., Li, Ch., Yao, D., and Wang, Sh. 2020. Feasibility of microbially induced carbonate precipitation and straw checkerboard barriers on desertification control and ecological restoration. Ecological Engineering. 152: 105883.
20.Li, H.L., Wan, L.L., Dong, Z., Liu, Z., and Wang, L.Y. 2012. Effects of Sand Barriers of Salix Psammophila on Soil Particle Size and Fractal Dimension. Chin Journal of Soil Science. 43: 540-545.
21.Li, X.R., Xiao, H.L., He, M.Z., and Zhang, J.G. 2006. Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions. Ecological Engineering. 28: 149-157.
22.Marinissen, J.C.Y., and Dexter, AR. 1990. Mechanisms of stabilization of earthworm casts and artificial casts. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 9: 163-167.
23.Martens, D.A. 2000. Plant residue biochemistry regulates soil carbon cycling and carbon sequestration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 32: 361-369.
24.Mazurak, A.P. 1950. Effect of gaseous phase on water-stable synthetic aggregates. Soil Science. 69: 135-148.
25.Mirbagheri, S. 2018. Studying the pollution of wind sediments to heavy metals in Shahrekord plain (M.Sc. thesis) Shahrekord University. (In Persian)
26.Monreal, C.M., Schnitzer, M., Schulten, H.R., Campbell, C.A., and Anderson, D.W. 1995. Soil organic structures in macro and micro aggregates of a cultivated brown chernozem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 27: 845-853.
27.Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanable, F.S., and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939, Washington. 569p.
28.Qiu, G.Y., Lee, I.B., Shimizu, H., Gao, Y., and Ding, G.D. 2004. Principles of sand dune fixation with straw checkerboard technology and its effects on the environment. Journal of Arid Environment. 56: 449-464.
29.Qu, J., Zu, R., Zhang, K., and Fang, H. 2007. Field observations on the protective effect of semi-buried checkerboard sand barriers. Geomorphology. 88: 193-200.
30.Qu, J.J., Huang, N., Ta, W.Q., Lei, J.Q., Dong, Z.B., Liu, X.W., Xue, X., Zu, R.P., and Zhang, K.C. 2005. Structural characteristics of Gobi sand-drift and its significance. Advance Earth Science. 20: 19-23.
31.Refahi, H. 2012. Wind erosion and conservation. University of Tehran press. 340p. (In Persian)
32.Salehi, N. 2015. Estimation of wind erosion in south of Shahrekord City (Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari Province, Iran) using different models. (M.Sc. theses) Shahrekord University. (In Persian)
33.Santiago, J.L., Martin, F., Cuerva, A., Bezdenejnykh, N., and Sanz-Andres, A. 2007. Experimental and numerical study
of wind flow behind windbreaks. Atmospheric Environment. 41: 6406-6420.
34.Sun, C.L., Liu, G.B., and Xue, S. 2016. Natural succession of grassland on the Loess Plateau of China affects multifractal characteristics of soil particle-size distribution and soil nutrients. Ecological Research. 31: 891-902.
35.Tian, L.H., Wu, W.Y., Zhang, D.S., Lu, R.J., and Wang, X.Q. 2015. Characteristics of erosion and deposition of straw checkerboard barriers in alpine sandy land. Environmental Earth Science. 74: 573-584.
36.Walkly, A., and Blake, A. 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science.37: 29-38.
37.Wang, T., Qu, J., and Niu, Q. 2020. Comparative study of the shelter efficacy of straw checkerboard barriers and rocky checkerboard barriers in a wind tunnel. Aeolian Research.43: 100575.
38.Wang, X., and Chen, G. 1996. A study on grain-size's changes of sand material in semi-covered sand barrier and shifting sand areas alone the oil-transporting highway in Tarim Desert. Journal of Desert Research. 16: 180-184.
39.Wang, Z.T., and Zheng, X.J. 2002. A simple model for calculating measurement of straw checkerboard barriers. Journal of Desert Research.22: 229-232. (In Chinese with English abstract)
40.Whitford, W.G. 2002. Ecology of Desert Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp. 299-301.
41.Zhang, Ch., Qing Li, Q., Zhou, N., Zhang, J., Kang, L., Shen, Y., and Jia, W. 2016. Field observations of wind profiles and sand fluxes above the windward slope of a sand dune before and after the establishment of semi-buried straw checkerboard barriers. Aeolian Research. 20: 59-70.
42.Zhang, Y., Hepike, C., Butenuth, M., and Hu, X. 2006. Automatic extraction of wind erosion obstacles by intergration of GIS data. DSM and stereo images. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 27: 1677-1690.
43.Zhang, K.C., Qu, J.J., Niu, Q.H., Zhang, W.M., and Han, Q.J. 2010. Simulative research on the mechanism of rocky checkerboard sand barriers along Qinghai-Tibet Railway in wind tunnel. Advances in Earth Science. 25: 284-289. (In Chinese with English abstract)
44.Zhang, S., Ding, G., Yu, M., Gao, G., Zhao, Y., Wu, G., and Wang, L. 2018. Effect of Straw Checkerboards on Wind Proofing, Sand Fixation, and Ecological Restoration in Shifting Sandy Land. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15: 2184.
45.Zheng, X.J. 2009. Mechanics of Wind-blown Sand Movement. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 309p.
46.Zobeck, T.M., Baddock, M., Van Pelt, R.S., Tatarko, J., and Acosta-Martinez, V. 2013. Soil property effects on
wind erosion of organic soils. Aeolian Research. 10: 43-51.
Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production
Volume 11, Issue 4
January 2022
Pages 29-54

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics