Effect of potassium-solublizing bacteria biofertilizer on yield and yield components of wheat in comparison to chemical potassium fertilizer application

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Islamic Azad University, Jiroft Branch, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Jiroft ,IRAN.

2 Associate Professor "Crop physiologist" Arak branch-Islamic Azad University- Arak-Iran,

3 Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch , Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Tehran ,IRAN.

Abstract

Background and Objective: The use of potassium solublizing bacteria (KSB) in soils containing an accumulation of insoluble and non-absorbable potassium by plants can help further solubility of these potassium mineral sources in the soil and thus the uptake of this element by the plant. Also, the application of KSB on the yield and yield components of wheat can prevent the overuse of potassium chemical fertilizers and instead predispose soil conditions for the development of plant nutrition. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of application of KSB in comparison with the application of common potassium chemical fertilizers in the country's farms on quantitative and qualitative traits of wheat grain.
Materials and methods: To study the effect of application of KSB on the yield of wheat cultivars in southern Kerman, Iran, this experiments were performed over two years in the form of split plots in a randomized complete block with three replications in the research farm of Islamic Azad University of Jiroft in loamy sand soil. Various wheat cultivars including Chamran 2, Barat and Khalil were located in the main plot and sources and amounts of calcium were at four levels: 1. Control (without fertilizers) 2. Application of chemical sulfate potassium (at the rate of 200 kg / ha based on soil test results 3. Half of the recommended chemical fertilizer at the rate of 100 kg/ha + consumption of KSB from the source of Potabarvar biofertilizer at the rate of 100 g/ha 4. KSB (at the rate of 100 g/ha as the seed treatment), were placed in sub-plots.
Results: The results showed that wheat cultivars showed different reactions to different levels and sources of fertilizer during the two years of the study. The highest grain yield in Chamran 2 cultivar was obtained by applying KSB at the rate of 8 t/ha. Application of KSB alone in Khalil cultivar and application of potassium solfate along with KSB in Barat cultivar produced 7.49 and 7.6 tons of grain per hectare, respectively, Whithout significant different by 8 tons per hectare. Application of KSB could significantly improve grain yield, spike length, number of grains per spike, grain nitrogen percentage and grain protein percentage.
Conclusion: The results showed that the applied KSB improved the quantitative and qualitative traits in wheat grain. Although the application of potassium sulfate based on soil test results also had an effective role to increase wheat traits, but it is suggested that in agriculture based on sustainability in agriculture, potassium biofertilizer should be used with half of the recommanded potassium sulfate fertilizer. In addition to reducing the consumption of chemical fertilizers, this can be effective in reducing wheat production costs and farm health.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Dastorani, M., Gholamalalipour Alamdari, E., Biabani, A., Avarseji, Z., & Habibi, M. (2019). Study the several herbicides effect on weeds control and yield of Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.). Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 14 (1), 83-95. [In Persian]
2.Dart, P. (1977). Infection and development of leguminous nodules. P 367-472. In R.W.F., Hardy, and W.S. Silver, A Treatise on Dinitrogen Fixation, Section III: Biology ed. New York John Wiley.
3.Ahemad, M., & SaghirKhan, M. (2010). Comparative toxicity of selected insecticides to Pea plants and growth promotion in response to insecticide-tolerant and plant growth promoting Rhizobium leguminosarum. Crop Protection, 29 (4), 325-329. doi:10.1016/j.cropro. 2010.01.005.
4.Calabrese, E. J. (2005). Paradigm lost, paradigm found: The reemergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose–response model in the toxicological sciences. Environmental Pollution, 138 (3), 378-411. Doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.10.001.
5.Arruda, J. S., Lopes, N. F., & Moura, A. B. (2001). Behavior of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains under different herbicide concentrations. Planta Daninha, 19 (1), 111-117. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582001000100013.
6.Baraldi, E., Mari, M., Chierici, E., Pondrelli, M., Bertolini, P., & Pratella, G. C. (2003). Studies on Thiabendazole resistance of Penicillium expansum of pears: pathogenic fitness and genetic characterization. Journal of Plant Pathology, 52, 362-370. Doi: 10.1046/ j.1365-3059.2003.00861.x.
7.Migliore, L., Rotini, A., & Thaller, M. C. (2013). Low doses of Tetracycline trigger the E. Cola growth: A case of hormetic response. Dose Response, 11 (4), 550-557.
8.Abbasian, A., & Rashed Mohasel, M. H. (2017). Community structure and Species diversity of Chickpea weeds in application of Imazethapyr and Trifuralin. Applied Agricultural Research, 29 (1), 39-45. [In Persian]
9.Emami, A. (1996). Methods of plant analysis. Agricultural Research and Education Organization. Soil & Water Research Institute. Technical Issue, 982, 202. [In Persian]
10.Sarikhani, M. R., Oustan, S., Ebrahimi, M., & Aliasgharzad, N. (2018). Isolation and identification of potassium-releasing bacteria in soil and assessment of their ability to release potassium for plants. European Journal of Soil Science.
69 (6), 1078-1086. Doi: 10.1111/ ejss. 12708.
11.Parmar, P. (2010). Isolation of potassium solubilizing bacteria and their inoculation effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.). M.Sc. thesis submitted to CCS Haryana Agricultural Uuniversity, Hisar.
12.Fulladosa, E., Murat, J. C., Bollinger, J. C., & Villaescusa, I. (2007). Adverse effects of organic arsenical compounds towards Vibrio fischeri bacteria. The Science of the Total Environment, 377 (2-3), 207-213. Doi: /10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2006.12.044.
13.Herridge, D. F., Peoples, M. B., & Boddey, R. M. (2008). Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant and Soil, 311, 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3.
14.Ferreira, T. C., Aguilar, J. V., Souza, L. A., Justino, G. C., Aguiar, L. F., & Camargos, L. S. (2016). pH effects
on nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation in Calopogonium mucunoides. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 39 (4), 1015-1020. doi: 10.1007/s40415-016-0300-0.
15.Bostrom, M. L., & Berglund, O. (2015). Influence of pH-dependent aquatic toxicity of ionizable pharmaceuticals on risk assessments over environmental pH ranges. Water Research Journal, 72, 154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.watres. 2014.08.040.
16.Kust, C. A., & Strockmeyer, E. B. (1971). Effects of Trifluralin on growth, nodulation and anatomy of soybeans. Weed Science, 19, 147-152.
17.György, E., Mara, G., Máthé, I., Laslo, E., Márialigeti, K., Albert, B., Oancea, F., & Lányi, S. (2010). Characterization and diversity of the nitrogen fixing microbiota from a specific grassland habitat in the Ciuc Mountains. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 15 (4), 5474-5481.
18.Miri, A. A., Avarseji, Z., Gholamalalipour Alamdari, E., & Nakhzari Moghaddam, A. (2020). Effect of pre-planting and post-vegetative herbicides and cultivars on yield and yield components of pea. Journal of Crop Production,
12 (4), 187-198. [In Persian]
19.Brain, P., & Cousens, R. (1989). An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Research, 29, 93-96. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-180.1989.tb00845.x.
20.Mahfouz, S. A., & Sharaf-Edin, M. A. (2007). Effect of mineral vs. Biofertilizer on growth, yield and essential oil content of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). International Agrophysics. 21, 361-366.
21.Flores, F. J., & Garzon, C. D. (2013). Detection and assessment of chemical hormesis on the radial growth in vitro of Oomycetes and fungal plant pathogens. Dose-Response, 11, 361-373. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.12-026.Garzon.
22.Bagherani, N., Galeshi, S., Zeinali, E., & Arzanesh, M. H. (2014). Evaluation of Trifluralin, Metribuzin and Imazethapyr herbicides effects on Bradyrhizobium japonicum isolates growth. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 4 (3), 251-268. [In Persian]
23.Anderson, A., Baldock, J. A., Rogers, S. L., Bellotti, W., & Gill, G. (2004). Influence of Chlorsulfuron on rhizobial growth, nodule formation and nitrogen fixation with Chickpea. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, 1059-1070. Doi:10.1071/AR03057.
24.Laranjo, M., Young, J. P. W., & Oliveira, S. (2012). Multilocus sequence analysis reveals multiple symbiovars within Mesorhizobium species. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 35, 359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm. 2012.06.002.
25.Lin, S., Pi, Y., Long, D., Duan, J., Zhu, X., Wang, X., He, J., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Impact of Organic and Chemical Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Crop Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Soybean–Maize Intercropping Systems. Agriculture, 12 (9), 1428. doi:10.3390/ agriculture12091428.
26.Bittner, L., Kluver, N., Henneberger, L., Muhlenbrink, M., Zarfl, C., & Escher, B. I. (2019). Combined ion-trapping and mass balance models to describe the
pH-dependent uptake and toxicity of acidic and basic pharmaceuticals in zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio). Environmental Science and Technology, 53 (13), 7877-7886. doi:10.1021/acs. est.9b02563.
27.Druin, P., Sellmani, M., Prevost, D., Fortin, J., & Antoun, H. (2010). Tolerance to agricultural pesticides of strains belonging to four genera of Rhizobiaceae. Journal Environmental Science and Health, 45, 780-788. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2010.515168.
28.Haiyan, N., Li, N., Qiu, J., Chen, Q., & He, J. (2018). Biodegradation of Pendimethalin by Paracoccus sp.13. Current Microbiology, 75, 1077-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00284-018-1494-0.
29.Nour, S. M., Cleyet-Marel, J. C., Normand, P., & Fernandez, M. P. (1995). Genomic heterogeneity of strains nodulating chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and description of Rhizobium mediterraneum sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 45, 640-648. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-4-640.