A comprehensive overview of slow / controlled-release fertilizers and production methods and their advantages and disadvantages

Document Type : Complete scientific article - review

Authors

1 Department of Soil and Water Research, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Nanotechnology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Karaj, Iran

3 Department of Soil and Water Research,Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Ardebil(Moghan); Agricultural Research, Education and Extesion Organization(AREEO), Ardebil, Iran

4 Department of Soil and Water Research, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran.

10.22069/ejsms.2026.23396.2183

Abstract

Indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers, especially nitrogen, not only imposes heavy costs on farmers, but also causes environmental pollution. Nitrate is easily leached out of the reach of plants due to its lack of retention by soil particles. The entry of excess phosphorus and nitrate into surface and underground water causes the phenomenon of eutrophication, reduction of oxygen level, excessive increase of unwanted species, and finally the death of aquatic life. Increased nitrate concentrations in drinking water can threaten the health of people, especially children. Also, greenhouse gas emissions and the accumulation of heavy metals are other consequences of the excessive use of chemical fertilizers. One of the effective methods for improving nutrient use efficiency and reducing environmental risks is the use of slow-release fertilizers. These types of fertilizers are specifically designed to release their nutrients in a controlled manner throughout the plant's growth period. This feature not only increases crop yield but also improves the absorption of essential nutrients from the soil.
Materials and Methods: In this article, an attempt has been made to explain the concept of slow/controlled-release fertilizers and their differences, nutrient release mechanisms, and factors affecting them. Also, types of slow/controlled release fertilizers, production methods, required equipment, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method have been examined. Matrice and coating methods are used to synthesize fertilizers with physical barriers. The fertilizers are coated with inorganic compounds such as sulfur or organic compounds such as resins and thermoplastic Polymer. The release of nutrients takes place through the processes of diffusion, chemical decomposition, swelling, and osmosis. Fertilizer coating is done by two physical and chemical methods. The physical method includes fluid bed, pan coating, rotary drum coating, melting and extrusion, and chemical methods of inverse suspension polymerization, solution polymerization or cross-linking, and microwave irradiation.

Results: Although in most cases, slow/controlled release fertilizers are used interchangeably, the two are different. The rate of nutrient release from slow-release fertilizers is slower than that of conventional fertilizers, but the rate, duration, and pattern of release cannot be controlled. However, the rate, duration, and pattern of release in controlled-release fertilizers can be controlled and occurs over a specific time period. Slow-release fertilizers are divided into three groups, including compounds with low-soluble organic nitrogen, such as urea-formaldehyde and isobutylidine diurea, water-soluble fertilizers with a physical barrier, and low-soluble inorganic fertilizers.
Conclusion: One-time use of slow/controlled release fertilizers reduces labor costs due to reduced need for fertilization. These fertilizers increase plant access to nutrients by controlling the release of nutrients and reducing risks and toxicity. They also increase seed germination and the growth of quality crops. Factors such as temperature, pH, and ionic strength of the environment affect the release of nutrients from fertilizers synthesized using the matrix method. While the release of nutrients from coated fertilizers depends on factors such as the size of the fertilizer granules, the thickness and uniformity of the coating, the type of material, as well as the type of crosslinking and filler, and temperature. As the thickness of the coating layers, granule size, and coating uniformity increase, the rate of nutrient release decreases. Fluidized bed and pan coating methods are among the most widely used methods for coating fertilizers. Although the melt extrusion method is a very simple method, it also requires expensive equipment. Although these fertilizers are more expensive than conventional fertilizers, they have many advantages over them that justify the higher cost. The price of imported SRFs in Iran is influenced by factors related to currency and market demand.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Balali, M. R., Moameni, A., Malakouti, M. J., & Afkhami, M. (2003). Balanced soil fertilization towards sustainable agriculture and food security in Iran. In Congress Global Food Security and the Role of Sustainable Fertilization, FAO, Rome, Italy. 16 p.
  2. Malakouti, M. J. 2018. The role of optimal fertilizer use in yield increasing and producing healthy agricultural products.Tehran: Moballeghan Publications, 464p. [in Persian].
  3. Kiiski, H., Scherer, H.W., Mengel, K., Kluge, G., & Severin, K. (2000). Fertilizers, 1. General. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 2000, pp. 1-30.  
  4. Arvin, P. (2019). Study of Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on Physiological and Morphological Parameters and Essential Oils in Savory Plant (Satureja hortensis L.). Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology), 32(2), 260-279.doi: 1001.1.23832592.1398.32.2.15.0. [in Persian].
  5. Melero, S., Vanderlinden, K., Ruiz, J. C., & Madejon, E. (2008). Long-term effect on soil biochemical status of a Vertisol under conservation tillage system in semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44(4), 437-442. doi: 1016/j.ejsobi.2008.06.003
  6. Lustosa Filho, J. F., Penido, E. S., Castro, P. P., Silva, C. A., & Melo, L. C. (2017). Co-pyrolysis of poultry litter and phosphate and magnesium generates alternative slow-release fertilizer suitable for tropical soils. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5(10), 9043-9052. doi: 1021/acssuschemeng.7b01935
  7. Sardi, K., & Csitari, G. (1998). Potassium fixation of different soil types and nutrient levels. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29(11-14), 1843-1850. doi: 10.1080/00103629809370074
  8. Subbarao, C. V., Kartheek, G., & Sirisha, D. (2013). Slow release of potash fertilizer through polymer coating. International Journal of Applied science and engineering, 11(1), 25-30.
  9. Azeem, B., KuShaari, K., Man, Z. B., Basit, A., & Thanh, T. H. (2014). Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. Journal of controlled release, 181, 11-21. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020
  10. Controlled and Slow Release Fertilizers Market. (2025). Controlled & Slow Release Fertilizers Market 2025-2035. Retrieved from [https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/controlled-and-slow-release-fertilizer-market]
  11. nanourea plus [internet]. [place of publication unknown]: nanourea; [Date of publication unknown] [accessed 2025 May 11]. Available from: https://nanourea.in/en/nanourea-plus
  12. Atlas Group. (n.d.). Agriculture. Retrieved May 11, 2025, from https://atlasgpco.com/agri/
  13. Kian Arjan. (n.d.). Kian Arjan Company: Producer of Urea Fertilizer with the Best Quality and Price.Retrieved May 11, 2025, from https://kianarjan.com/%D8%B4%D8%B1%DA%A9%D8%AA-%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%98%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%AF-%DA%A9%D9%86%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%A7-2/
  14. [Product Name]. [Internet]. Alborz, Fardis: Malltina; [Date of publication unknown] [accessed 2025 May 11]. Available from: https://malltina.com/product/mlt-24486105
  15. Trenkel, M. E. 2010. Slow-and Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers: an Option for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Agriculture. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), Paris, 160p.
  16. Gregorich, E. G., Turchenek, L.W., Carter, M.R., & Angers, D.A. (2001). Soil and Environmental Science Dictionary. CRC Press, Boca Raton. doi:10.1201/9780849331152
  17. Lewu, F. B., Volova, T., Thomas, S., & Rakhimol K. R. Controlled release fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press, 263p.
  18. Tolescu, C., & Iovu, H. (2010). Polymer conditioned fertilizers. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series B: Chemistry and Materials Science, 72(2),3-14.
  19. Salimi, M., Motamedi, E., Mostesharezedeh, B., Davoodi, D., Alikhani, H. A., & Seyed Hosseini, H. M. 2021. Synthesis of Slow-release Urea Fertilizer Using Starch-based Polymer Nanocomposite Coating and Investigation of Its Effect on Tomato Growth (.Lycopersicon esculentum L). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(2):301-312.[in Persian] doi:22059/IJSWR.2020.313429.668798.
  20. Salimi, M., Motamedi, E., Safari, M. & Motesharezadeh, B. (2021). Synthesis of urea slow-release fertilizer using a novel starch-g-poly(styrene-co-butylacrylate) nanocomposite latex and its impact on a model crop production in greenhouse. Cleaner Production, 322,129082. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129082
  21. Motamedi, E., Safari, M., & Salimi, M. (2023). Improvement of tomato yield and quality using slow release NPK fertilizers prepared by carnauba wax emulsion, starch-based latex and hydrogel nanocomposite combination. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 11118. doi: 1038/s41598-023-38445-7
  22. Raiesi Ardali, T., Ma’mani, L., Chorom, M., Motamedi, E., & Fathi Gharebaba, M. (2024). A biocompatible NPK+ Fe+ Zn slow release fertilizer: synthesis and its evaluation in tomato plant growth improvement. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 4640. doi: 1038/s41598-024-55152-z
  23. Raiesi-Ardali, T., Maˈmani, L., Chorom, M., & Moezzi, A. (2022). Improved iron use efficiency in tomato using organically coated iron oxide nanoparticles as efficient bioavailable Fe sources. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 9(1), 59. doi:10.1186/s40538-022-00318-y
  24. Khamseh, A., Golchin, A., & Shafiei, S. (2024). Evaluating the efficiency of Controlled-Release Phosphorus Fertilizers based on biochar’s of grape pruning residues, walnut skins and wheat stubble produced at two pyrolysis temperatures (350°C and 650°C). Journal of Natural Environment. 77(2), 271-284. [in Persian] .doi:10.22059/jne.2024.368033.2622
  25. Maghsoodi, M. R., Najafi, N., Reyhanitabar, A., & Oustan, S. (2025). Effects of Biochar, Hydrochar, Zeolite, and Hydroxyapatite Nanorods as Urea Carriers on Some Agronomical Traits and Water Use Efficiency of Rice Plant. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 25(1), 450-464. doi: 10.1007/s42729-024-02143-8
  26. Meng, T., Shi, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, X., Zhang, D., Chen, L., Lu, Z., Cheng, Y., Hao, Y., Zhao, X & Wang, Y. (2024). Slow-release nitrogen fertilizer application regulated rhizosphere microbial diversity to increase maize yield. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1481465. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1481465
  27. Mirbolook, A., Sadaghiani, M. R., Keshavarz, P., & Alikhani, M. (2023). New slow-release urea fertilizer fortified with zinc for improving zinc availability and nitrogen use efficiency in maize. ACS omega, 8(48), 45715-45728.doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c06013
  28. Zhang, Y., Jiao, G., Wang, J., & She, D. (2024). Preparation of Lignin-Based Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer. Sustainability, 16(23), 10289. doi:10.3390/su162310289
  29. Dere, I., Gungula, D. T., Kareem, S. A., Andrew, F. P., Saddiq, A. M., Tame, V. T., Kefas, H. M., Patrick, D. O & Joseph, J. I. (2025). Preparation of slow-release fertilizer derived from rice husk silica, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, polyvinyl alcohol and paper composite coated urea. Heliyon. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42036
  30. Xiang, Y., Liu, Y., Gong, M., Tong, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, G., & Yang, J. (2023). Preparation of novel biodegradable polymer slow-release fertilizers to improve nutrient release performance and soil phosphorus availability. Polymers15(10), 2242. doi:10.3390/polym15102242
  31. Channab, B. E., Tayi, F., Aqlil, M., Akil, A., Essamlali, Y., Chakir, A., & Zahouily, M. (2024). Graphene oxide, starch, and kraft lignin bio-nanocomposite controlled-release phosphorus fertilizer: Effect on P management and maize growth. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 282, 137190.doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137190
  32. Pilotto, L., Scalera, F., Piccirillo, C., Marchiol, L., Zuluaga, M. Y. A., Pii, Y., Cesco, S., Civilini, M., & Fellet, G. (2025). Phosphorus Release from Nano-Hydroxyapatite Derived from Biowastes in the Presence of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria: A Soil Column Experiment. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c09325
  33. Najfi, N. (2021). Sustained/Controlled-release phosphorus fertilizers: An option for enhancing phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture and abating the environmental hazards. Land Management, 8(2), 155-179. doi: 10.22092/lmj.2020.127490.203 [in Persian]
  34. 34. Hongyan, T., Xuebin, W., Jincheng, W., & Guosheng, W. (2023). Preparation and properties of potassium alginate soil conditioner microspheres coated with poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) microgel membrane. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 658, 130709. doi: 1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130709
  35. Sahu, B. K., Swami, K., Kapoor, N., Agrawal, A., Kataria, S., Sharma, P., Kundu, P., Thangavel, H., Vattakkuniyil, A., Chaurasia, O. P., & Shanmugam, V. (2024). Soil-mimetic eco-friendly fertilizer gates: nanoclay-reinforced binary carbohydrates for improving crop efficiency. Environmental Science: Nano, 11(7), 3006-3018. doi: 10.1039/D3EN00682D
  36. Li, M., E, G., Wang, C., Shi, R., Wang, J., Wang, S., & Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Liu, Z. (2023). Synthesis and application of modified lignin polyurea binder for manufacturing a controlled-release potassium fertilizer. Agronomy, 13(10), 2641.  doi:10.3390/agronomy13102641
  37. Bandyopadhyay, S., Ghosh, K., & Varadachari, C. (2014). Multimicronutrient Slow‐Release Fertilizer of Zinc, Iron, Manganese, and Copper. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2014(1), 327153. doi: 10.1155/2014/327153
  38. Jiménez-Rosado, M., Perez-Puyana, V., Guerrero, A., & Romero, A. (2022). Micronutrient-controlled-release protein-based systems for horticulture: Micro vs. nanoparticles. Industrial Crops and Products, 185, 115128. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11030580
  39. Dari, B., Rogers, C. W., & Walsh, O. S. (2019). Understanding factors controlling ammonia volatilization from fertilizer nitrogen applications. Univ. Ida. Ext. Bul926, 1-4. https://www.extension.uidaho.edu/publishing/pdf/BUL/BUL926.pdf
  40. Pelster, D. E., Chantigny, M. H., Angers, D. A., Bertrand, N., MacDonald, J. D., & Rochette, P. (2018). Can soil clay content predict ammonia volatilization losses from subsurface-banded urea in eastern Canadian soils?. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 98(3), 556-565. doi:10.1139/cjss-2018-0036
  41. Mirzaei Varoei, M., Oustan, S., Reyhanitabar, A., & Najafi, N. (2023). Preparation, characterization and nitrogen availability of nitrohumic acid as a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69(14), 3345-3361. doi:10.22067/jsw.2023.80642.1244
  42. Maghsoodi, M. R., Najafi, N., Reyhanitabar, A., & Oustan, S. (2020). Hydroxyapatite nanorods, hydrochar, biochar, and zeolite for controlled-release urea fertilizers. Geoderma, 379, 114644. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114644
  43. Duan, Q., Jiang, S., Chen, F., Li, Z., Ma, L., Song, Y., Yu, X., Chen,Y., Liu, H. & Yu, L. (2023). Fabrication, evaluation methodologies and models of slow-release fertilizers: a review. Industrial Crops and Products, 192, 116075. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116075
  44. Yang, M., Fang, Y., Sun, D., & Shi, Y. (2016). Efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors (dicyandiamide and 3, 4-dimethypyrazole phosphate) on soil nitrogen transformations and plant productivity. a meta-analysis, Scientific reports, 6(1), 22075. doi:10.1038/srep22075
  45. Bi, S., Barinelli, V., & Sobkowicz, M. J. (2020). Degradable controlled release fertilizer composite prepared via extrusion: Fabrication, characterization, and release mechanisms. Polymers, 12(2), 301. doi:10.3390/polym12020301
  46. Lubkowski, k., Smorowska, A., Markowska-Szczupak, A., & Ukielski, R. (2016). Copolyester-coated mineral fertilizers – preparation, characterization,

and nutrient release. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 98, 1163-1172. doi:

10.1080/02772248.2015.1130225

  1. Rashidzadeh, A., & Olad, A. (2014). Slow-released NPK fertilizer encapsulated by NaAlg-g-poly (AA-co-AAm)/MMT superabsorbent nanocomposite. Carbohydrate Polymers, 114, 269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.010
  2. Versino, F., Urriza, M., & García, M. A. (2019). Eco-compatible cassava starch films for fertilizer controlled-release. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 134, 302-307.doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.037
  3. Nardi, P., Ulderico, N. E. R. I., Di Matteo, G., Trinchera, A., Napoli, R., Farina, R., Subbarao G. V., & Benedetti, A. (2018). Nitrogen release from slow-release fertilizers in soils with different microbial activities. Pedosphere, 28(2), 332-340. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60429-6
  4. Salimi, M., Motamedi, E., & Mostesharezedeh, B. (2023). The use of starch-based polymer nanocomposite latex for coating chemical fertilizers and investigating various factors releasing nutrients. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 53(12), 2905-2919.doi:10.22059/ijswr.2023.351739.669404. [in Persian].
  5. Tajarudin, H. A., & Ng, C. W. C. 2022. Biocoating for Fertilizer Industry. Springer. 72p.
  6. Salimi, M., Motamedi, E., Mostesharezedeh, B., Alikhani, H. A., & Seyed Hosseini, H. M. (2022). Production of Slow Release Urea Fertilizer by Three Methods of Rotary Drum Coating, Insitu and Two-Stage Hydrogel Synthesis and Evaluation Their Performance in Tomato Greenhouse Cultivation. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 53(8),1715-1726. doi:10.22059/ijswr.2022.333757.669128. [in Persian].
  7. Raban, S. 1994. Release mechanisms of membrane coated fertilizers. Advances in Agronomy, 1-49.
  8. Raban, S., Zeidel, E., & Shaviv, A. (1997). Release mechanisms controlled release fertilizers in practical use. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Dahlia Greidinger Symposium on Fertilization and The Environment. 287-295.
  9. Shaviv, A., Raban, S., & Zaidel, E. (2003). Modeling controlled nutrient release from polymer coated fertilizers: Diffusion release from single granules. Environmental science & technology, 37(10), 2251-2256. doi: 10.1021/es011462v
  10. Teodorescu, M., Lungu, A., Stanescu, P. O., & Neamtu C. (2009). Preparation and properties of novel slow-release NPK agrochemical formulations based on poly (acrylic acid) hydrogels and liquid fertilizers. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(14), 6527-6534. doi: 10.1021/ie900254b
  11. Shoji, S. (1992). Controlled release fertilizers with polyolefin resin coating; Development, properties and utilization. Konno.
  12. 58. Chen, D., Suter, H., Islam, A., Edis, R., Freney, J. R., & Walker, C. N. (2008). Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers. Soil Research, 46(4), 289-301. org/10.1071/SR07197
  13. 59. Shirley Jr, A. R., & Meline, R. S. (1975). Patent No. 3,903,333, S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 1975.
  14. Detrick, J. H. (1997). Patent No. 5,599,374, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC.
  15. Ni, B., Liu, M., & Lü, S. (2009). Multifunctional slow-release urea fertilizer from ethylcellulose and superabsorbent coated formulations. Chemical Engineering Journal, 155(3), 892-898. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2009.08.025
  16. Liu, J., Yang, Y., Gao, B., Li, Y. C., & Xie, J. (2019). Bio-based elastic polyurethane for controlled-release urea fertilizer: Fabrication, properties, swelling and nitrogen release characteristics. Journal of Cleaner Production209, 528-537. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.263
  17. Araújo, B. R., Romão, L. P., Doumer, M. E., & Mangrich, A. S. (2017). Evaluation of the interactions between chitosan and humics in media for the controlled release of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Management, 190, 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.059
  18. Calabi-Floody, M., Medina, J., Rumpel, C., Condron, L. M., Hernandez, M., Dumont, M., & de La Luz Mora, M. 2018. Smart fertilizers as a strategy for sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 147, 119-157. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.003
  19. Wei, H., Wang, H., Chu, H., & Li, J. (2019). Preparation and characterization of slow-release and water-retention fertilizer based on starch and halloysite. International Journal of Biological macromolecules, 133: 1210-1218. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.183
  20. 66. Gharekhani, H., Olad, A., & Hosseinzadeh, F. (2018). Iron/NPK agrochemical formulation from superabsorbent nanocomposite based on maize bran and montmorillonite with functions of water uptake and slow-release fertilizer. New Journal of Chemistry, 42(16): 13899-13914. doi:10.1039/c8NJ01947A
  21. Majeed, Z., Ramli, N. K., Mansor, N., & Man, Z. (2015). A comprehensive review on biodegradable polymers and their blends used in controlled-release fertilizer processes. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 31(1), 69-95. doi: 10.1515/revce-2014-0021
  22. Lawrencia, D., Kiat Wong, S., Yi Sern Low, D., Hing Goh, B., Kheng Goh, J., Rungsardthong Ruktanonchai, U., Soottitantawat, A., Han Lee, L., & Ying Tang. (2021). Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review on Coating Materials and Mechanism of Release. Plants, 10, 238. doi:10.3390/plants10020238
  23. Dai, C., Yang, L., Xie, J., & Wang, T. J. (2020). Nutrient diffusion control of fertilizer granules coated with a gradient hydrophobic film. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 588, 124361. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124361
  24. Yang, L., An, D., Wang, T. J., Kan, C., & Jin, Y. (2017). Swelling and diffusion model of a hydrophilic film coating on controlled-release urea particles. Particuology, 30, 73-82.doi:10.1016/j.partic.2016.03.005
  25. Wang, Y., Guo, H., Wang, X., Ma, Z., Li, X., Li, R., Li, Q., Wang, R. & Jia, X. (2020). Spout fluidized bed assisted preparation of poly (tannic acid)-coated urea fertilizer. ACS omega, 5(2), 1127-1133.doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03310
  26. Giroto, A. S., Guimarães, G. G., Colnago, L. A., Klamczynski, A., Glenn, G., & Ribeiro, C. 2019. Controlled release of nitrogen using urea-melamine-starch composites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 448-455.  doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.275
  27. Popov, B. N. (2015). Corrosion engineering: principles and solved problems. Elsevier
  28. Ahmed, E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105-121. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
  29. El Assimi, T., Beniazza, R., Raihane, M., Youcef, H. B., El Meziane, A., Kricheldorf, H., & Lahcini, M. (2022). Overview on progress in polysaccharides and aliphatic polyesters as coating of water-soluble fertilizers. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 19(4), 989-1007.
  30. Salimi, M., Channab, B., El Idrissi, A., Zahouily, M. & Motamedi, E. (2023). A comprehensive review on starch: Structure, modification, and applications in slow/controlled-release fertilizers in agriculture. Carbohydrate Polymers, 322, 121326.doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121326
  31. Salimi, M., El Idrissi, A., Channab, B. E., Essamlali, Y., Firouzabadi, A. G., Beygi, M., & Motamedi, E. (2024). Cellulose-based controlled release fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: recent trends and future perspectives. Cellulose, 1-48. doi: 10.1007/s10570-024-06273-1
  32. Salimi, M., Motamedi, E., Motesharezedeh, B., MirseyedHosseini, H. & Alikhani, H. (2020). Starch-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) composites reinforced with natural char nanoparticles toward environmentally benign slow-release urea fertilizers. Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8, 103765. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.103765.
  33. Zareabyaneh, H., & Bayatvarkeshi, M. (2015). Effects of slow-release fertilizers on nitrate leaching, its distribution in soil profile, N-use efficiency, and yield in potato crop. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74, 3385-3393. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4374-y.
  34. Richards, D. L., & Reed, D. W. (2004). New Guinea impatiens growth response and nutrient release from controlled-release fertilizer in a recirculating subirrigation and top-watering system. HortScience, 39(2), 280-286. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.39.2.280
  35. Shaviv, A. (2005). Controlled Release Fertilizers. in: IFA International Workshop on Enhanced-Efficiency Fertilizers, Frankfurt, International Fertilizer Industry Association Paris, France
  36. Jin, Y. Y., Sun, R. F., Su, Y., Xu, J., Zhao, S., & Cheng, X. B. (2016). Research status of coated slow-and controlled-release fertilizers at home and abroadv [J]. Vegetables, 9, 40-44. doi: 10.46488/NEPT.2022.v21i04.028
  37. Sazzad, M.H., Islam, M.T., & Chowdhury, F. A. 2013. Review & Outlook of Slow-Release Fertilizer. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Germany, pp: 1-156, 978-3659415074.